Automated Detection of Local Coherence in Short Argumentative Essays Based on Centering Theory
نویسندگان
چکیده
We describe in this paper an automated method for assessing local coherence in short argumentative essays. We use ideas from Centering Theory to measure local coherence of essays’ paragraphs and compare it to human judgments on one analytical feature of essay quality called Continuity. Paragraphs which correspond to a discourse segment in our work and which are dominated by one prominent concept were deemed locally coherent according to Centering Theory. A dominance measure was proposed based on which local coherence was judged. Results on a corpus of 184 argumentative essays showed promising results. Our findings also suggest that focusing on nominal subject for detecting candidate concepts for a discourse segment’s central concept is sufficient, which confirms previous findings. Compared to previous approaches to assessing local discourse coherence in essays, our method is fully automated.
منابع مشابه
Evaluation of text coherence for electronic essay scoring systems
Existing software systems for automated essay scoring can provide NLP researchers with opportunities to test certain theoretical hypotheses, including some derived from Centering Theory. In this study we employ the Educational Testing Service’s e-rater essay scoring system to examine whether local discourse coherence, as defined by a measure of Centering Theory’s Rough-Shift transitions, might ...
متن کاملThe Role of Centering Theory's Rough-Shift in the Teaching and Evaluation of Writing Skills
Existing software systems for automated essay scoring can provide NLP researchers with opportunities to test certain theoretical hypotheses, including some derived from Centering Theory. In this study we employ ETS's e-rater essay scoring system to examine whether local discourse coherence, as de ned by a measure of Rough-Shift transitions, might be a signi cant contributor to the evaluation of...
متن کاملConstruction of Evaluative Meanings by Kurdish-Speaking Learners of English: A Comparison of High- and Low-Graded Argumentative Essays
Academic writing ability is an important goal that learners of English as a Second Language (ESL) or English as a Foreign Language (EFL) try to attain. While ESL students’ academic writings have been widely explored, owing to few studies investigating appraisal resources in EFL students’ argumentative writing, the gap still exists about EFL students’ academic writing. This study aimed to see ho...
متن کاملModeling Argument Strength in Student Essays
While recent years have seen a surge of interest in automated essay grading, including work on grading essays with respect to particular dimensions such as prompt adherence, coherence, and technical quality, there has been relatively little work on grading the essay dimension of argument strength, which is arguably the most important aspect of argumentative essays. We introduce a new corpus of ...
متن کاملAn Optimal Approach to Local and Global Text Coherence Evaluation Combining Entity-based, Graph-based and Entropy-based Approaches
Text coherence evaluation becomes a vital and lovely task in Natural Language Processing subfields, such as text summarization, question answering, text generation and machine translation. Existing methods like entity-based and graph-based models are engaging with nouns and noun phrases change role in sequential sentences within short part of a text. They even have limitations in global coheren...
متن کامل